海南省自然生态承载力研究

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.03.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 自然生态承载力是当前国际可持续发展定量研究的前沿问题之一。提出按照各类土地的实际生产能力和实际生态服务功能计算各类土地的生态承载力,将消纳污染和水资源的供给功能纳入区域自然生态承载力计算模型,并简称该方法为"实际供给法"。依据海南省统计年鉴资料和生态调查资料,应用"实际供给法"计算和分析了海南省1952~2004年自然生态承载力的动态变化特征:①海南省自然生态承载力长期持续增长,由1952年的7.0804hm²/人上升到2004年的8.5984hm²/人,增加了1.5180hm²/人,年均增长0.4%;②可再生资源生态承载力占总生态承载力的绝大部分,1952年和2004年分别占98.6%和92.3%,而不可再生资源生态承载力仅分别占1.4%和7.7%;③水资源生态承载力呈跳跃式下降,从1952年的6.8165hm²/人下降到2004年的0.4473hm²/人;耕地、海域和淡水水域的承载力呈上升趋势,分别从1952年的0.1277、0.0057和0.0001hm2/人上升到2004年的2.6066、3.1192和1.1468hm²/人,其它土地类型生态承载力变化不明显;④在生态承载力组成中,水资源比例由大到小变化显著,从96.3%下降到5.2%,耕地、海域的比例由小到大变化显著,分别从1.8%、0.1%上升到30.3%、36.3%,其它土地都由小到大,但所占比例较小;海域、耕地和水资源是海南生态承载力的主要贡献因素,三者之和占到总量的71.8%~98.2%。并分析了海南省自然生态承载力动态变化的原因。

关键词: 生态足迹, 自然生态承载力, 土地面积法, 实际供给法, 海南省

Abstract: Natural ecological carrying capacity is one of the leading fields of international quantitative study of sustainable development.The model calculated regional natural ecological carrying capacity with actual productivity and effective service function of natural ecological system and coupled self-purification ability with water resource supplying function.Therefore the model was named as "actual supply law".The research indicated that "actual supply law" reflects a regional natural ecological carrying capacity objectively and accurately.This paper applied "actual supply law" to the calculation and analysis of the characteristics of dynamic changes of natural ecological carrying capacity of Hainan province from 1952 to 2004 based on the existing data of Hainan Province Statistical Yearbooks and ecological survey data: ①The natural ecological carrying capacity of Hainan Province has been increasing for a long time,per capita natural ecological carrying capacity increased from 7.0804 ha in 1952 to 8.5984 ha in 2004,an increase of 1.5180 ha and an annual average increasing rate of 0.4%.②The carrying capacity of renewable resource occupied considerable proportion of total ecological carrying capacity,accounting for respectively 98.6% and 92.3%;however,the ecological carrying capacity of un-renewable resource occupied only 1.4% and 7.7% in 1952 and 2004.③The carrying capacity of water resource decreased from per capita 6.8165 ha in 1952 to 0.4473 ha in 2004;but the carrying capacity of arable land,sea sector and freshwater body showed a rising tendency,which increased from 0.1277 ha,0.0057 ha and 0.0001 ha in 1952 to 2.6066 ha,3.1192 ha and 1.1468 ha in 2004,and other types of land ecological carrying capacity kept basically unchanged.④In the composition of the ecological carrying capacity,the proportion of water resources changed significantly from 96.3% in 1952 to 5.2% in 2004 dramatically;but the arable land,sea sector and freshwater body had a reversed remarkable change,respectively from 0.1277 ha,0.0057 ha and 0.0001 ha in 1952 increased to 2.6066 ha,3.1192 ha and 1.1468 ha in 2004,and other types of land showed ascending change but the proportion is relatively small.The arable land,sea sector and water resources are the main factors of the ecological carrying capacity of Hainan,the summation of these three factors occupies 71.8%-98.2%.The paper analyzed the causes of dynamic changes of ecological carrying capacity in Hainan Province.Firstly,the advancement of science and technology and improvement of management level are the fundamental reasons for the continuous increase of ecological carrying capacity in Hainan Province.Secondly,dynamic changes of ecological carrying capacity of all types of land are induced by synthetically factors of nature and society reflected the change of their actual ecological service function.Thirdly,the module amelioration is a key factor reflecting mainly the regional natural ecological carrying capacity.Finally,a pronounced drop of ecological carrying capacity of water resources in Hainan Province has both natural and man-made causes.

Key words: ecological footprint, natural ecological carrying capacity, method of land area, actual supply law, Hainan Province

中图分类号:

Q148

符国基, 徐恒力, 陈文婷. 海南省自然生态承载力研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(3): 412-421.

FU Guo-ji, XU Heng-li, CHEN Wen-ting. Natural Ecological Carrying Capacity in Hainan Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2008, 23(3): 412-421.

参考文献

[1] 杨开忠,杨咏,陈洁. 生态足迹分析理论与方法[J]. 地球科学进展, 2000, 15 (6): 630 ～636. [YANG Kai-zhong, YANG Yong, CHEN J ie. Ecological footp rint analysis: Concep t, method and cause. Advance in Earth Science, 2000, 15 (6): 630-636.] [2] WackernagelM, ReesW. Our Ecological Footp rint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth[M]. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers, 1996. [3] WackernagelM, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. Ecological footp rints of nations[A]. Commissioned by the Earth Council for the Rio + 5 Forum. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. Toronto, 1997. 4-25. [4] 刘年丰,谢鸿宇,肖波. 生态容量及环境价值损失评价[M]. 北京:化工工业出版社, 2005. 16 ～17. [L IU Feng-nian, XIE Hong-yu, XIAO Bo. Evaluation of Ecological Capacity and Environmental Value Loss. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2005. 16-17.] [5] 李明月,江华. 生态足迹分析模型的假设条件缺陷及应用偏差[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2005, 26 (1): 6～9. [LI Mingyue, J IANG Hua. Defect of hypothesis and deviation of app lication of ecological footp rint model. Research of Agricultural M odernization, 2005, 26 (1): 6-9.] [6] 陈敏,张丽君,王如松,等. 1978 ～2003 年中国生态足迹动态分析[J]. 资源科学, 2005, 27 (6): 132 ～139. [CHEN Min, ZHANG Li-jun, WANG Ru-song, et al. Dynamic analysis of ecological footp rint of China from 1978-2003. Re2 sources Science, 2005, 27 (6): 132-139.] [7] 范晓秋. 水资源生态足迹研究与应用(硕士论文) [D]. 南京:河海大学, 2005. 15～20. [FAN Xiao2qiu. Study on the Princip le ofWater Resources Ecological Footp rint and App lication in J iangsu Province. Nanjing: HohaiUniversity, 2005. 15-20.] [8] 海南省水务局. 2004年海南省水资源公报[EB /OL]. http://swj.hainan.gov.cn/hnsw2.HTM. 2008-01-02. [Water Bureau of Hainan Province. Water ResourcesBulletin of Hainan Province in 2004. http://swj.hainan.gov.cn/hnsw2.HTM. 2008-01-02.] [9] 国土资源部信息中心,曹新元,陈丽萍,等. 中国国土资源可持续发展研究报告(2004) [M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2005. 45～48. [Center of Information, Ministry of Land and Resources, CAO Xin-yuan, CHEN Li-ping, et al. The Research Report of China National Territory Resources Sustainable Development (2004) . Beijing: The Geological Publishing House, 2005. 45-48.] [10] 海南省统计局. 海南统计年鉴(1996) [M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 1996. [Statistical Bureau of Hainan Province. Hainan Statistical Yearbook (1996) . Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1996.] [11] 海南省统计局. 海南统计年鉴(2005) [M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2005. [Statistical Bureau of Hainan Province. Hainan Statistical Yearbook (2005) . Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2005.] [12] 海南省国土环境资源厅. 2004年海南省环境状况公报[N]. 海南日报, 2005-06-05 (5) . [Department of Land En2 vironment Resources of Hainan Province. Environment StatusBulletin of Hainan Province in 2004. Hainan Daily, 2005-06-05 (5) .] [13] 国家环境保护总局. 全国生态现状调查与评估(中南卷) [M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2006. [State Environmental Protection Administration of China. Investigation and App raisal of National Ecology Present Situation (South Central Volume) . Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2006.

[1]	毕明丽, 谢高地, 姚翠友. 人类可持续发展指数的改进及国际比较[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1017-1029.
[2]	王淑新, 何红, 李双, 杜建括. 中国旅游足迹家族研究进展[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 424-436.
[3]	聂莹, 刘清杰, 孙素芬. 经济全球化能够有效抑制“一带一路”沿线国家的生态足迹吗?——来自动态门槛面板模型的经验证据[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 301-311.
[4]	林永钦, 齐维孩, 祝琴. 基于生态足迹的中国可持续食物消费模式[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 338-347.
[5]	杨屹, 胡蝶. 生态脆弱区榆林三维生态足迹动态变化及其驱动因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(7): 1204-1217.
[6]	靳相木, 李陈. 土地承载力研究范式的变迁、分化及其综论[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(3): 526-540.
[7]	杨屹, 梁砺波, 张景乾. 关中城市群生态足迹演变趋势及公平性评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(8): 1360-1373.
[8]	靳相木, 柳乾坤. 自然资源核算的生态足迹模型演进及其评论[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(1): 163-176.
[9]	孙艳芝, 沈镭. 关于我国四大足迹理论研究变化的文献计量分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(9): 1463-1473.
[10]	曹淑艳, 谢高地. 城镇居民食物消费的生态足迹及生态文明程度评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(7): 1073-1085.
[11]	王灵恩, 成升魁, 钟林生, 刘晓洁, 高利伟, 曹晓昌. 旅游城市餐饮业食物消费及其资源环境成本定量核算——以拉萨市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(2): 215-227.
[12]	郝海广，李秀彬，张惠远，张继平. 农牧交错区农户生态足迹及其影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(1): 52-63.
[13]	杨欣, 蔡银莺, 张孝宇, 张安录. 基于生态账户的农田生态补偿空间转移研究—以武汉城市圈48个县(市、区)为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(2): 197-207.
[14]	曹淑艳, 谢高地, 陈文辉, 郭红. 中国主要农产品生产的生态足迹研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(8): 1336-1344.
[15]	付伟, 赵俊权, 杜国祯. 资源可持续利用评价——基于资源福利指数的实证分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(11): 1902-1915.