辽中地区矿业城市生态承载力研究

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.01.010

自然资源学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 87-94.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.01.010

辽中地区矿业城市生态承载力研究

顾康康^1,2, 刘景双¹, 窦晶鑫^1,2

1. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所,长春 130012;
2. 中国科学院研究生院,北京 100049

收稿日期:2007-01-09 修回日期:2007-09-29 出版日期:2008-02-01 发布日期:2008-02-01
作者简介:顾康康(1982- ),男,安徽蚌埠人,博士研究生,主要从事生态经济与区域可持续发展研究。E-mail:gukangkang@neigae.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划973计划(2004CB418507)。

The Research about Ecological Carrying Capacity of Mining Cities in Central Liaoning

GU Kang-kang^1,2, LIU Jing-shuang¹, DOU Jing-xin^1,2

1. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS, Changchun 130012;
2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2007-01-09 Revised:2007-09-29 Online:2008-02-01 Published:2008-02-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生态足迹模型是度量可持续发展的一种方法,加入经济因子以提高模型评价的准确性,为辽中地区矿业城市可持续发展提供决策依据。运用生态足迹模型计算了辽中地区矿业城市1985~2005年人均生态足迹、人均生态承载力和生态赤字,利用压力—状态—响应模型耦合生态足迹、生态承载力和经济因子得到综合生态承载力指数,评价了辽中地区矿业城市1985~2005年综合生态承载力水平。结果表明:1985~2005年,辽中地区矿业城市人均生态足迹从1.79 hm²增至3.53 hm²,增长率为97.43%;人均生态承载力从0.78 hm²增至0.81 hm²,生态赤字从-1.01 hm²增至-2.73 hm²,增加了190.17%;综合生态承载力指数先降低,2000年以后略有增加,其中综合生态承载力水平1985年很高,1990年较低,1995、2000年一般,2003、2005年较高。对比生态足迹模型得到的生态承载力和通过压力—状态—响应模型得到的综合生态承载力指数,两者的变化趋势一致,具有很强的相关性。综合生态承载力指数评价指标的丰富在一定程度上增加了评价的公正性和准确性,可以更好地反映区域可持续发展程度,为其它生态足迹研究提供了一定的借鉴。

关键词: 生态足迹, 生态赤字, 综合生态承载力指数, 可持续发展, 辽中地区矿业城市

Abstract: Ecological footprints model is a method of measuring the sustainable development. In recent years, ecological footprints model has been a widely accepted tool to quantify the sustainable development level in many fields. However, ecological footprints model neglected the sustainability of economy and science technology. In order to improve the veracity of the model we join the economic factors, and they would provide suggestions for the sustainable development of mining cities in central Liaoning. We calculated ecological footprints(EF),ecological carrying capacity(EC) and budget of mining cities in central Liaoning between 1985 to 2005 by ecological footprints model; after coupling ecological footprint, ecological carrying capacity and economic factors by P-S-R model, we got synthetic ecological carrying capacity index and estimated synthe-tic ecological carrying capacity level of mining cities in central Liaoning between 1985 to 2005. Results showed that: in mining cities in central Liaoning between 1985 to 2005, the EF increased from 1.79 ha to 3.53 ha, the increasing rate was 97.43%; the EC increased from 0.78 hm² to 0.81 ha; the budget increased from -1.01 ha to -2.73 ha, the increasing rate was 190.17%; the synthetic ecological carrying capacity index reduced first, then increased from 2000; the synthetic ecological carrying capacity level was very high in 1985, lower in 1990, common in 1995 and 2000, and high in 2003 and 2005. The changing trend between ecological carrying capacity and synthetic ecological carrying capacity index was alike. The test result indicated that synthetic ecological carrying capacity index was developed from ecological carrying capacity, the relativity between them was high; and the synthetic ecological carrying capacity index was coupled by ecological carrying capacity, ecological footprints and economic factors, the richness of indicators could also improve the veracity of the estimated results. So the explorative research of ecological footprints model and economic factors was carried out which could give some use for reference of the other research about ecological footprints model.

Key words: ecological footprint, budget, synthetic ecological carrying capacity index, sustainable development, mining cities in central Liaoning

中图分类号:

F062.2

顾康康, 刘景双, 窦晶鑫. 辽中地区矿业城市生态承载力研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(1): 87-94.

GU Kang-kang, LIU Jing-shuang, DOU Jing-xin. The Research about Ecological Carrying Capacity of Mining Cities in Central Liaoning[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2008, 23(1): 87-94.

参考文献

[1] Kathryn B B, Richard J B, Ross C, et al. New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zea-land economy[J]. Ecological Economics,1998,27:149-160. [2] Mathis W, Larry O, Patricia B, et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept [J]. Ecolo-gical Economics,1999,29:375-390. [3] Helmut H, Karl HB, Fridolin K. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: The case of Austria 1926-1995[J]. Ecological Economics,2001,38:24-45. [4] 徐中民,张志强,程国栋.甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析[J].地理学报,2000,55(5):607~616. [5] 孙凡,孟令彬.重庆市生态足迹与生态承载量研究[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(7):1370~1374 . [6] 董泽琴,孙铁珩.生态足迹研究——辽宁省生态足迹计算与分析[J].生态学报,2004,24(12):2735~2739. [7] 刘宇辉,彭希哲.中国历年生态足迹计算与发展可持续性评估[J].生态学报,2004,24 (10): 2257~2262. [8] 尚海洋,马忠,焦文献,等.甘肃省城镇不同收入水平群体家庭生态足迹计算[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(3):408~416. [9] 王书华,毛汉英,王忠静.生态足迹研究的国内外近期进展[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(6):776~782. [10] 曾涤,王廉.香港特区可持续发展的现状分析与战略趋势预测[J].广州市财贸管理干部学院学报,2002, 58(2):1~7. [11] 沈镭.新亚欧大陆桥沿线矿业城市发展与矿业扶贫初探[J].宁夏大学学报(自然科学版),1997,20(2):90~102. [12] Mathis W, Chad M, Karl H B, et al. Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1999: Comparing the conventional approach to an’actual land area’approach[J]. Land Use Policy,2004,21:261-269. [13] 徐建华.现代地理学中数学方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002. [14] 乔家君.改进的层次分析法在河南省可持续发展能力评估中的应用[J].河南大学学报(自然科学版),2003, 33(2):58~62. [15] 左伟,周惠珍,王桥.区域生态安全评价指标体系选取的概念框架研究[J].土壤,2003,(1):2~7. [16] Adnan AH, Stephen R D. Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics[J]. Ecological Economics,2006,60:86-99. [17] 刘树峰,陈俊合.基于神经网络理论的水资源承载力研究[J].资源科学,2007,29(1):99~105. [18] 顾康康,刘景双,窦晶鑫.资源型城市生态承载力对土地利用变化的响应[J].生态与农村环境学报,2007, 23(2):7~11. [19] Helmut H, Mathis W, Fridolin K, et al. Ecological footprints and human appropriation of net primary production: A comparison[J]. Land Use Policy,2004,21:279-288. [20] Mathis W, Chad M, Niels B S, et al. Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: Resolving conceptual challenges[J]. Land Use Policy,2004,21:271-278. [21] 龙爱华,张志强,苏志勇.生态足迹评介及国际研究前言[J].地球科学进展,2004,19(6):971~981. [22] 彭建,吴建生,蒋依依,等.生态足迹分析应用于区域可持续发展生态评估的缺陷[J].生态学报,2006,26(8): 2716~2722.

辽中地区矿业城市生态承载力研究

The Research about Ecological Carrying Capacity of Mining Cities in Central Liaoning

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	汪芳, 苗长虹, 刘峰贵, 陈兴鹏, 米文宝, 海春兴, 段德罡, 王金平, 张占仓, 王成新. 黄河流域人居环境的地方性与适应性：挑战和机遇[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 1-26.
[2]	李海涛, 李明阳. 基于能值的哈萨克斯坦可持续发展评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2218-2228.
[3]	毕明丽, 谢高地, 姚翠友. 人类可持续发展指数的改进及国际比较[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1017-1029.
[4]	张晓琳, 金晓斌, 范业婷, 刘晶, 单薇, 周寅康. 1995-2015年江苏省土地利用功能转型特征及其协调性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 689-706.
[5]	何焱洲, 王成. 基于信息熵的乡村生产空间系统演化及其可持续发展能力[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 815-828.
[6]	王淑新, 何红, 李双, 杜建括. 中国旅游足迹家族研究进展[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 424-436.
[7]	聂莹, 刘清杰, 孙素芬. 经济全球化能够有效抑制“一带一路”沿线国家的生态足迹吗?——来自动态门槛面板模型的经验证据[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 301-311.
[8]	林永钦, 齐维孩, 祝琴. 基于生态足迹的中国可持续食物消费模式[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 338-347.
[9]	彭焜, 朱鹤, 王赛鸽, 陈斌, 魏文栋, 李佳硕. 基于系统投入产出和生态网络分析的能源-水耦合关系与协同管理研究——以湖北省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(9): 1514-1528.
[10]	杨屹, 胡蝶. 生态脆弱区榆林三维生态足迹动态变化及其驱动因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(7): 1204-1217.
[11]	靳相木, 李陈. 土地承载力研究范式的变迁、分化及其综论[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(3): 526-540.
[12]	焦志倩, 王红瑞, 许新宜, 杨博. 自然资源资产负债表编制设计及应用Ⅱ：应用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(10): 1715-1724.
[13]	杨屹, 梁砺波, 张景乾. 关中城市群生态足迹演变趋势及公平性评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(8): 1360-1373.
[14]	龙亮军, 王霞, 郭兵. 基于改进DEA模型的城市生态福利绩效评价研究——以我国35个大中城市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(4): 595-605.
[15]	靳相木, 柳乾坤. 自然资源核算的生态足迹模型演进及其评论[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(1): 163-176.