中国1990~2004年生态足迹动态变化效应的分解分析

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.01.007

自然资源学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 61-68.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.01.007

中国1990~2004年生态足迹动态变化效应的分解分析

刘建兴, 王青, 孙鹏, 顾晓薇, 李广军

东北大学资源与生态经济研究中心,沈阳 110004

收稿日期:2007-03-23 修回日期:2007-09-03 出版日期:2008-02-01 发布日期:2008-02-01
作者简介:刘建兴(1972- ),男,新疆石河子人,博士生,主要从事资源经济与生态经济领域的研究。E-mail:liujx1972@163.com
基金资助:
教育部优秀中青年教师基金项目资助(1711)。

Decomposition Effect on China’s Annual Ecological Footprints Variation from 1990 to 2004

LIU Jian-xing, WANG Qing, SUN Peng, GU Xiao-wei, LI Guang-jun

Resources and Ecological Economics Research Center, Northeastern University, Liaoning 110004, China

Received:2007-03-23 Revised:2007-09-03 Online:2008-02-01 Published:2008-02-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过构建生态足迹分解模型,论文将中国1990~2004年生态足迹的动态变化分解为经济规模、产业结构和足迹强度这3种因素的变化效应,并对各分解效应进行了测度与分析。结果表明:生态足迹年度间变化均值为1.065 5×10⁸hm²。其中,由经济规模、产业结构和足迹强度所引起的足迹变化分别为2.108 2×10⁸hm²,-0.439 8×10⁸hm²和-0.602 9×10⁸hm²。总的看,经济规模的变化助长了总足迹的增长,而足迹强度和产业结构的变化对总足迹的扩张起到了一定的遏制作用。生态足迹变化是由各因素共同作用的结果,而在不同时期各因素对足迹变化所发挥的效应不同。该研究结果对于理解我国生态足迹变化与经济发展之间的关系,以及产业发展政策调整及可持续发展研究具有一定参考价值。

关键词: 中国, 生态足迹, 经济规模, 产业结构, 足迹强度, 分解效应

Abstract: There is a certain impact and influence on the ecological environment when human utilizes natural resources and obtain access to the ecological services function nature provides. Ecological footprint indicator is such an integrated indicator to measure the use of human resources and the effects on the ecological environment. The ecological footprint is not only a means to record the process of the survival and development of mankind’s ecological resources of changing history, but also embodies the scale of economic development and the evolution of consumption levels for each stage. Through building the decomposition model of ecological footprint, variable of ecological footprints of China during the period from 1990 to 2004 was decomposed to three different changing effects, namely GDP, structure of industry economy and ecological footprint identity of industries, and each decomposition effect was measured and analyzed in this study.The results show that: 1) Varied factors impacted together on variation of ecological footprints and these factors exerted different effects on the variable of general ecological footprints in different periods of time. From 1990 to 2004 the total footprint changes always show an increasing trend. Inter-annual change’ mean of ecological footprint is 2.1082×10⁸ha, thereinto, the scale of economic development, the industrial structure and the identity of industries ecological footprint have different contributions to the change, being 2.1082×10⁸ha, -0.6029×10⁸ha and -0.4398×10⁸ha respectively. 2) Growth of GDP is a drive to the increase of the general ecological footprints, while the change in industrial structure and increase of ecological footprint identity of industries constrain the growth of the general ecological footprints variation on the contrary. 3) It is a key in depression periods of time to reduce growth of ecological footprints by adjusting structure of industry economy and improving identity of ecological footprint. This research will promote understanding the theory about harmonous development stratagem and development occasions, and possess reference value by all means to the adjustment of policy of industrial development and the study of sustainable development relatively.

Key words: China, ecological footprint, GDP, structure of industry economy, ecological footprint identity of industries, decomposition effect

中图分类号:

F062.2

刘建兴, 王青, 孙鹏, 顾晓薇, 李广军. 中国1990~2004年生态足迹动态变化效应的分解分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(1): 61-68.

LIU Jian-xing, WANG Qing, SUN Peng, GU Xiao-wei, LI Guang-jun. Decomposition Effect on China’s Annual Ecological Footprints Variation from 1990 to 2004[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2008, 23(1): 61-68.

参考文献

[1] Wackernagel M, Rees W. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth [M]. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers, 1996. [2] Mathis Wackernagel, Larry Onisto, Patricia Bello, et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J]. Ecological Economics,1999,29:375-390. [3] Gernot Stglehner. Ecological footprint—A tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2003, 11:267-277. [4] Wackernagel M, Lewan L, Hansson C B. Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint: Application in Sweden and subregions[J]. Ambio,1999,28(7):604-612. [5] 张贵祥,杨志峰.广州市生态可持续发展水平对比评价[J].生态学报,2003,23(10):2101~2114. [6] Stefan Gossling, Carina Borgsteom Hansson, Oliver Horstmeier, et al. Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability[J]. Ecological Economics,2002,43:199-211. [7] 席建超,葛全胜,成升魁,等.旅游消费生态占用初探——以北京市海外入境旅游者为例[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(2):224~229. [8] 章锦河,张捷.旅游生态足迹模型及黄山市实证分析[J].地理学报,2004,59(5):763~771. [9] 梁勇,成升魁,闵庆文.城市交通生态占用研究——以北京为例[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2005,35(3):484~488. [10] 孙兆敏,贾志宽,尚爱军,等.西部地区生态足迹与苜蓿产业发展战略研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2005,13(1):160~163. [11] 符国基.基于生态足迹的海南农产品结构优化分析[J].农业现代化研究,2006,27(5):389~392. [12] 赖力,黄贤金.全国土地利用总体规划目标的生态该足迹评价研究[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(2):66~71. [13] Helmut Haberl, Karl Heinz Erb, Fridolin Krausmann. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: The case of Austria, 1926 ~1995[J]. Ecological Economics,2001,38: 25-45. [14] Karl Heinz Erb. Actual land demand of Austria 1926~2000: A variation on ecological footprint assessments[J]. Land Use Policy,2004,21:247-259. [15] Mathis Wackernagel, Chad Monfreda, Karl-Heinz Erb, et al. Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1999: Comparing the conventional approach to an’actual land area’ approach[J]. Land Use Policy,2004,21:261-269. [16] Sun J W. Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: A complete decomposition model[J]. Energy Economics,2002,20(1):85-100. [17] Stern D, Common M. Economics growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development[J]. World Development,1996,24(7):1151-1160. [18] 刘建兴,顾晓薇,王青,等.中国经济发展与生态足迹的关系研究[J].资源科学,2005,27(5):33~39. [19] 尤飞,钟有丽,王传胜.生态经济持续性的度量和趋势预测——以甘肃武威市为例[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(6):743~749. [20] 吴开亚,王玲杰.生态足迹及其影响因子的偏最小二乘回归模型与应用[J].资源科学,2006,28(6):182~188.

中国1990~2004年生态足迹动态变化效应的分解分析

Decomposition Effect on China’s Annual Ecological Footprints Variation from 1990 to 2004

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	段存儒, 曾贤刚. 中国资源型城市转型对劳动力需求的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 606-617.
[2]	马恩朴, 蔡建明, 林静, 廖柳文, 郭华, 韩燕. 近30年中国农业源氮磷排放的格局特征与水环境影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 752-770.
[3]	余斌, 李营营, 朱媛媛, 卓蓉蓉, 曾菊新. 中国中部农区乡村重构特征及其地域模式——以江汉平原为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2063-2078.
[4]	成升魁, 沈镭, 封志明, 钟帅. 中国自然资源研究的发展历程及展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1757-1772.
[5]	沈镭, 钟帅, 胡纾寒. 新时代中国自然资源研究的机遇与挑战[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1773-1788.
[6]	王凯, 朱芳书, 甘畅, 席建超. 区域产业结构转型升级水平与旅游扶贫效率耦合关系——以武陵山片区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(7): 1617-1632.
[7]	陈明星, 周园, 汤青, 刘晔. 新型城镇化、居民福祉与国土空间规划应对[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(6): 1273-1287.
[8]	毕明丽, 谢高地, 姚翠友. 人类可持续发展指数的改进及国际比较[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1017-1029.
[9]	李帅, 张勃, 马彬, 候启, 何航. 基于格点数据的中国1961—2016年≥5 ℃、≥10 ℃有效积温时空演变[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1216-1227.
[10]	姜海宁, 张文忠, 余建辉, 张建伟. 山西资源型城市创新环境与产业结构转型空间耦合[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 269-283.
[11]	杨传明. 新旧常态中国产业全碳足迹复杂网络比较[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 313-328.
[12]	方梓行, 何春阳, 刘志锋, 赵媛媛, 杨延杰. 中国北方农牧交错带气候变化特点及未来趋势——基于观测和模拟资料的综合分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 358-370.
[13]	湛东升, 吴倩倩, 余建辉, 张文忠, 张娟锋. 中国资源型城市房价时空变化与影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(12): 2888-2900.
[14]	刘承良, 王杰, 杜德斌. 中美能源权力的空间领域与均势区演化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(11): 2596-2612.
[15]	夏四友, 郝丽莎, 唐文敏, 崔盼盼, 吴凤连. 复杂网络视角下世界石油流动的竞合态势演变及对中国石油合作的启示[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(11): 2655-2673.