淮河闸坝对河流生态影响评价研究——以蚌埠闸为例

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.01.006

自然资源学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 48-60.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.01.006

淮河闸坝对河流生态影响评价研究——以蚌埠闸为例

夏军^1,3, 赵长森^1,2, 刘敏⁴, 王纲胜¹, 张永勇³, 刘玉^1,2

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所陆地水循环及地表过程重点实验室,北京 100101;
2. 中国科学院研究生院,北京 100049;
3. 武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,武汉 430072;
4. 华东师范大学资源与环境学院,上海 200062

收稿日期:2007-09-23 修回日期:2007-10-22 出版日期:2008-02-01 发布日期:2008-02-01
作者简介:夏军(1954- ),男,湖北广水人,研究员,主要从事水文水环境方面的科学研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金国际合作重大项目(No. 50279049);中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(Kzcx2-yw-126)。

Impact Assessment of Dams & Flood Gates Projects of Huaihe River on River Ecosystem:A Case Study of the Bengbu Site

XIA Jun^1,3, ZHAO Chang-sen^1,2, LIU Ming⁴, WANG Gang-sheng¹, ZHANG Yong-yong³, LIU Yu^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101,China;
2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China;
4. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Received:2007-09-23 Revised:2007-10-22 Online:2008-02-01 Published:2008-02-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 论文以历史时期淮河干流水生态调查与2006年全流域重点闸坝水生态调查资料为依据,通过分析水生态指标与同期水质指标之间的关系,建立淮河水文-水质-生态耦合模型,提出了一种水利闸坝工程对水生态影响的评价方法。利用该模型分析了淮河中下游重点闸——蚌埠闸对其下游水生态系统的影响,结果表明:①蚌埠闸对下游水生态系统中浮游植物影响最大,浮游动物次之,对底栖动物的影响最小;②与历史时期水生态状况对比发现,蚌埠闸下游的水生态质量比历史时期有所降低;水利工程闸坝修建后对其下游水生态系统有一定的不利影响;③通过加强闸坝的调度,增加下泄水量,满足生态需水,可以缓解对下游水生态系统的不利影响。

关键词: 淮河, 闸坝, 环境影响, 河流生态, 评价

Abstract: This paper addresses a method applied to the impact assessment of dams & flood gates projects in Huaihe River on river ecosystem. Major contents include: 1) the river ecosystem survey in 2006 and related historical investigation; 2) building coupled models of river hydrological process with water quality and ecosystem indicators system; and 3) development of assessment method applied to impact assessment of dams & flood gates projects in Huaihe River on river ecosystem, where the relationship between ecosystem indicators and water quality indicators could be recognized. The case study of the Bengbu site was given as an explanation of this method. The results indicate that dams and flood gates projects have significant impact on river ecosystem. For Bengbu case, the biggest impact is on phytoplanktons of the aquatic ecosystem, then on zooplanktons and zoobenthos. By comparison with historical ecosystem situation, the ecosystem quality of downstream of Bengbu site has a decline due to dams and gates construction. By the way, it also shows that river system could be improved by strengthening operation of river ecosystem and increasing ecological flow.

Key words: Huaihe River, dams and gates, environmental impact, river ecosystem, assessment

中图分类号:

X820.3

夏军, 赵长森, 刘敏, 王纲胜, 张永勇, 刘玉. 淮河闸坝对河流生态影响评价研究——以蚌埠闸为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(1): 48-60.

XIA Jun, ZHAO Chang-sen, LIU Ming, WANG Gang-sheng, ZHANG Yong-yong, LIU Yu. Impact Assessment of Dams & Flood Gates Projects of Huaihe River on River Ecosystem:A Case Study of the Bengbu Site[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2008, 23(1): 48-60.

参考文献

[1] James A E. Lernaea(Copepod) Infection of Three Native Fishes from the Salt River Basin, Arizona. M. S. Thesis. Tempe: Arizona State University,1968. [2] Dolan R A, A Howard, A Gallenton. Man’ s impact on the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon[J]. Am. Sci., 1974,(62). [3] Stanford J A, J V Ward. The Colorado River system. In: B Davier, K F Walker. The Ecology of River Systems. Dordrecht, TheNetherlads: Dr. W. Junk Publishers,1986. [4] Crayton W M, M R Sommerfeld. Phytoplankton of the lower Colorado River, Grand Canyon Region[J]. J. Ariz. Nev. Acad. Sci.,1978,(13). [5] Armitage P D. Environmental changes induced by stream regulation and their effect on lotic macroinvertebrate communities. In: A Lillehammer, A J Saliveit. Regulated Rivers. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo Press,1984. [6] Ward J V, J A Stanford. The ecology of regulated streams. Past accomplishments and directions for future research. In: J F Craig, J B Kemper. Regulated Streams: Advances in Ecology. New York: Plenum Press,1987. [7] Voelz N J, J V Ward. Biotic and abiotic gradients in a regulated high elevation Rocky Mountain river[J]. Regulated Ri-vers,1989,(3). [8] Stephen Higgs, Elizabeth Maclin, Margaret Bowman, et al. The ecology of dam removal-A summary of benefits and impacts. American Rivers. http://americanrivers.org.2002. [9] Eaglson P S. Ecohydrology: Darwinmian Expression of Vegetation and Function[M]. London, UK: Cambridge University Press,2002. [10] Rodriguez I, Porporato A. Ecohydrology of Water Controlled Ecosystem: Soil Moisture and Plant Dynamics[M]. London, UK: Cambridge University Press,2004. [11] Xia Jun, FENG Hua-li, ZHAN Che-sheng, et al. Determination of a reasonable percentage for ecological water-use in the Haihe River Basin, China[J]. Pedosphere,2006,16(1):563-575. [12] 夏军.维系黄河健康生命的理念与实践[J].科学对社会的影响,2005,20(4):288~292. [13] 郑利民,王世忠,黄福贵.黄河水利枢纽对生态环境的影响[J].西北水电,2005,(3):4~6. [14] 毛战坡,彭文启,王世岩,等.三门峡水库运行水位对湿地水文过程影响研究[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2006,4(1):36~41. [15] 洪再恭."绿水"工程中橡胶坝的水环境和生态问题初探[J].水利科技,2006,(2):32~33. [16] 刘庄,沈渭寿,吴焕忠.水利设施对淮河水域生态环境的影响[J].地理与地理信息科学,2003,19(2): 77~81. [17] 索丽生.闸坝与生态[J].中国水利,2005,(16):5~7. [18] 刘昌明,郑红星,王中根.流域水循环分布式模拟[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2006. [19] 张东,张万昌,朱利,等.SWAT分布式流域水文物理模型的改进及应用研究[J].地理科学,2005,(4): 434~440. [20] 张银辉.SWAT模型及其应用研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2005,(5):121~130. [21] 丁晋利,郑粉莉.SWAT模型及其应用[J].水土保持研究,2004,(4):128~130. [22] 张永勇,夏军,王纲胜,等.淮河流域闸坝联合调度对河流水质影响分析[J].武汉大学学报(工学版), 2007,40(4):31~35. [23] M Di luzio, R Srinivasan, J G Arnold, et al. ARCVIEW interface for SWAT2000 user’s guide. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas TWRI Report TR-193, 2002. [24] S L Neitsch, J G Arnold, J R Kiniry, et al. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, version 2000. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas TWRI Report TR-191,2002.

淮河闸坝对河流生态影响评价研究——以蚌埠闸为例

Impact Assessment of Dams & Flood Gates Projects of Huaihe River on River Ecosystem:A Case Study of the Bengbu Site

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	郝庆, 邓玲, 封志明. 面向国土空间规划的“双评价”：抗解问题与有限理性[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 541-551.
[2]	席茜, 丁赞, 叶润青, 牛瑞卿. 基于FCE-AHP的黄石市地质环境承载力评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 646-658.
[3]	刘大鹏, 马斌, 王悦. 工业城市防护绿色空间布局适宜性评价——以内蒙古包头市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 420-434.
[4]	苏鹤放, 曹根榕, 顾朝林, 金家梁, 张晓明, 易好磊, 郑毅, 傅强. 市县“双评价”中优势农业空间划定研究：理论、方法和案例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1839-1852.
[5]	车冰清, 朱传耿, 仇方道. 淮海经济区城乡空间融合格局及形成机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1897-1907.
[6]	白凯, 王馨. 《旅游资源分类、调查与评价》国家标准的更新审视与研究展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(7): 1525-1540.
[7]	保继刚, 陈苑仪, 马凌. 旅游资源及其评价过程与机制:技术性评价到社会建构视角[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(7): 1556-1569.
[8]	燕守广, 李辉, 李海东, 张银龙. 基于土地利用与景观格局的生态保护红线生态系统健康评价方法——以南京市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1109-1118.
[9]	王成, 樊荣荣, 龙卓奇. 重庆市乡村生产空间系统风险评价及其空间分异格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1119-1131.
[10]	肖攀, 彭轲, 赵幸悦子, 王新峰, 梁川, 程刚. 长江中游岸线资源与开发利用适宜性评价分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(4): 788-798.
[11]	王洁, 摆万奇, 田国行. 土地利用生态风险评价研究进展[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 576-585.
[12]	张海朋, 何仁伟, 刘运伟, 方方. 青藏高原高寒牧区聚落用地适宜性评价及其重构——以藏北那曲县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 698-712.
[13]	周云亨, 陈佳巍, 叶瑞克, 陈牧秦, 张雨亭, 曹雨辰. 国家天然气安全评价指标体系的构建与应用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(11): 2645-2654.
[14]	丁月清, 洪增林, 金光, 张亚鸽, 薛旭平, 杨建华. 关中地区清洁能源供暖综合效益评价——西安某商业建筑的案例实证[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(11): 2759-2769.
[15]	岳文泽, 吴桐, 王田雨, 夏皓轩. 面向国土空间规划的“双评价”：挑战与应对[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(10): 2299-2310.