国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正
|
王淑佳, 孔伟, 任亮, 治丹丹, 戴彬婷
|
Research on misuses and modification of coupling coordination degree model in China
|
WANG Shu-jia, KONG Wei, REN Liang, ZHI Dan-dan, DAI Bin-ting
|
|
表5 修正后模型的二元系统耦合度模拟值
|
Table 5 Simulation value of coupling degree of binary system based on modified model
|
|
U1 | U2 | C | U1 | U2 | C | U1 | U2 | C | U1 | U2 | C | U1 | U2 | C | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.000 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.000 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.000 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.548 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.894 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.000 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.000 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.661 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.000 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.000 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.346 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.239 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.775 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.000 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.671 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.529 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.378 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.887 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.100 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.000 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.693 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.507 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.000 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.200 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.000 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.849 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.632 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.000 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.300 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.516 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.000 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.756 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.149 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.400 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.775 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.000 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.878 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.258 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.500 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.000 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.289 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.000 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.365 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.600 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.000 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.447 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.000 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.471 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.700 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.418 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.592 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.194 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.577 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.800 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.632 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.730 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.316 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.683 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.900 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.822 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.866 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.433 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.789 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.000 |
|
|
|