Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (NIAHS) are carriers of the traditional farming civilization of the Chinese nation, exhibiting significant social, economic, and cultural values. The reproduction of NIAHS can provide new impetus for rural industrial restructuring in heritage sites. Transforming the value of NIAHS can provide new pathways for rural industrial restructuring in the heritage sites. Taking Weiqiao village, a core village within a China Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage System site, as a case study, this study reveals the process and mechanisms of its industrial transformation driven by cultural reproduction, grounded in Actor-Network Theory (ANT). The results indicate that: (1) During the industrial transformation process of Weiqiao, the government initially acted as the key actor. Centered on the reproduction of distinctive agricultural culture, it facilitated the enrollment of more heterogeneous actors into the actor network through intersegments, enrollment, and mobilization. Subsequently, the key actors shifted from the government to rural elites and diverse stakeholders. (2) The agricultural cultural reproduction comprises three phases: cultural restoration, cultural production and dissemination, and cultural consumption. Correspondingly, rural industrial transformation progressed through three stages: upgrading traditional agriculture, cultivating new business formats, and achieving industrial integration. (3) The driving mechanisms of rural industrial transformation in Weiqiao under cultural reproduction are: leadership by key actors, unveiling the agency of non-human actors, and intervention by heterogeneous actors. Taking a typical village in the heritage site as the research object, this study aims to contribute to the revitalization, utilization, and preservaton of traditional culture while offering new perspectives for the research on rural industrial transformation in China.

The redevelopment of urban inefficient land is a significant measure to implement the national resource conservation strategy and promote high-quality urbanization. To scientifically and effectively identify the models and operational mechanisms of urban inefficient land redevelopment in China, this paper employs a "diagnosis-design-result" analytical framework to elucidate the basic attributes, constituent elements, and action logic of urban inefficient land redevelopment. By using the prototype analysis method, four models are classified from 35 typical cases across the country, and a comparative analysis is conducted on the combination elements, operational processes, and applicable conditions of each model. The research findings are as follows: (1) Urban inefficient land redevelopment is a complex process nested by external factors such as "region-policy-plot-land user" and internal factors such as "subject-material-right-measure", guided by the demands of multiple subjects and driven by differentiated mechanism architectures. (2) From the perspective of the relationship between the government and the market, the models of urban inefficient land redevelopment mainly include government system supply-enterprise-led autonomous transformation by the original land user, government information communication-enterprise participation-transactional transformation by the original land user, government resource allocation-government-enterprise cooperation-government acquisition and transfer transformation, and government function dominance-full-cycle participation-independent acquisition and transformation. (3) The models of urban inefficient land redevelopment have different operational processes and specific applicable conditions, and reflect the differentiated driving forces of an active government and an effective market. In the process of promotion and application, they should be selected and used based on local conditions. This study reveals the common laws of urban inefficient land redevelopment under different conditions, providing important theoretical basis and practical implications for the continuous advancement of urban renewal and urban inefficient land redevelopment.